The article examines the Bermudian captive insurance model as a tool for corporate risk financing under challenging market conditions and amid the convergence of prudential standards. The relevance of the study is driven by the growth of cascading risks and by the practical dilemma between supervisory harmonization (the Solvency II/International Association of Insurance Supervisors logic) and business demand for proportionate regimes that prevent trapped capital in captives. The purpose of this research is to provide a systematic analysis of captive structures in Bermuda by comparing their regulatory architecture with Solvency II and US risk-based capital, and by identifying factors that enhance capital efficiency. The novelty lies in a comprehensive examination of the bifurcation of the Bermudian regime (Solvency II equivalence for the commercial sector alongside a separate pragmatic framework for captives), in a detailed reconstruction of Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement/Economic Balance Sheet mechanics based on Bermuda Monetary Authority technical materials, and in introducing an analysis of innovative classes (including digital insurers and the practice of Bitcoin denomination of reserves), as well as the legal construct of Incorporated Segregated Accounts Company as an enhanced form of risk segregation. The findings show that Bermuda’s approach makes capital requirements clearer and more closely tied to the risks a company actually takes. However, the reported solvency metrics can move more with market conditions. Bermuda stays competitive because it allows captives to lower their total cost of risk by retaining underwriting profits, earning investment income on reserves, and buying reinsurance more directly. New frameworks such as Incorporated Segregated Accounts Companies and the regulatory sandbox also support the development of new products and technologies in insurance. The article will be constructive for Chief Financial Officers, risk managers, actuaries, regulators, and consultants who work with captives and capital optimization.

captive insurance, BSCR, Solvency II, capital optimization, Economic Balance Sheet, ISAC, risk management, Bermuda

Gupta, A.; Venkataraman, S. Insurance and Climate Change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2024, 67, 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101412.

Bermuda Monetary Authority. BMA Captive Report 2023. Bermuda Monetary Authority. https://cdn.bma.bm/documents/2025-03-24-13-49-51-2023-Captive-Report.pdf (accessed 2025-12-01).

European Commission. Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2016/309. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_del/2016/309/oj/eng (accessed 2025-12-02).

Cravatte, M.; Duchesne, A.; Schneider, A.; Heluin, A.; Laveaux, G.; Munoz, R. Solvency II review 2025. Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/lu/en/our-thinking/future-of-advice/solvency-ii-review-2025.html (accessed 2025-12-03).

Ostrowska, M. On Proportionality within European (Re-)Insurance Captive Regulation. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Proportionality for the (Re-)Insurance Captives. AIDA Europe research series on insurance law and regulation. 2025, 13, 163–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82267-4_5.

Regele, F.; Gründl, H. Sectoral Asset Concentrations and Insurance Solvency Regulation. Journal of Insurance Regulation 43 (1). https://doi.org/10.52227/26725.2024.

Kennedys. Bermuda captive insurers. Kennedys. https://www.kennedyslaw.com/media/qndduwqk/kennedys_bermudacaptiveinsurers_longversion_feb2021.pdf (accessed 2025-12-06).

Veith, S.; Fieberg, C. On the Market Valuation of Insurance Accounting: An Assessment of Historical Cost and Fair Value Measurements. Journal of Risk & Insurance. 2025, 92 (4), 1059–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70025.

Gambaro, A. M. The Capital-On-Capital Cost in Solvency II Risk Margin. European Actuarial Journal. 2024, 15, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-024-00401-8.

Chen, Y.; Cheung, K. C.; Yam, S. C. P.; Yuen, F. L.; Zeng, J. On the Diversification Effect in Solvency II for Extremely Dependent Risks. Risks. 2023, 11 (8), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11080143.

Holl, B. R.; Zhu, A. The BMA’S upcoming regulatory review. SLC management. https://www.slcmanagement.com/content/dam/sunlife/regional/slc/documents/bre-summer-2023-article-slc-management-bma-regulatory-review.pdf (accessed 2025-12-10).

Wang, R.; Zitikis, R. An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3423042.

Turner, B.; Ranchod, M. Captive Insurance Guide. KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/bm/pdf/2024/09/captive-insurance-guide.pdf (accessed 2025-12-12).

Russell, D.; Chen, J.-L.; Chang, M.-S. S. Exploring the Connection between Captive Insurance and Cash Flow: Evidence from S&P Global 100 Companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2024-0061.

Bermuda Parliament. Incorporated Segregated Accounts Companies Act 2019. Bermuda Parliament. https://www.parliament.bm/admin/uploads/bill/c24f3c8f06ab5d38c529d83e757c57f6.pdf (accessed 2025-12-14).

Meanwhile Incorporated. Bitcoin Life Insurance Company Meanwhile Achieves a Historic Bitcoin Milestone with its First-Ever Audited BTC-denominated financial Statements. Globe Newswire. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/06/05/3094405/0/en/Bitcoin-Life-Insurance-Company-Meanwhile-Achieves-Historic-Bitcoin-Milestone-with-First-Ever-Audited-BTC-Denominated-Financial-Statements.html (accessed 2025-12-15).

SOA Research Institute. A Framework for Digital Asset Risks with Insurance Applications. SOA Research Institute. https://www.soa.org/49d0ab/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2024/digital-asset-risks-framework.pdf (accessed 2025-12-16).

Haar, L.; Gregoriou, A. Risk Management and Market Conditions. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2021, 78, 101959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101959.