Articles
| Open Access |
EXPLORING HEIDEGGER'S CONCEPT OF LANGUAGE: AN INTERPRETATION OF CONVERSATION THROUGH OBSERVATIONAL CONTEXT
Pankaj Lakethe , Indian Institute of Technology – Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IndiaAbstract
Martin Heidegger's phenomenological interpretation of Aristotle's theory of rhetoric makes it possible to comprehend the observational aspect of conversation. This paper presents the meaning of Heidegger's origination of manner of speaking and investigates the ontological parts of discussion accordingly, utilizing as hypothetical sources Heidegger's 1924 Marburg address, Being and Time, as well as different messages managing the issue of the being of language. Rhetoric is the study of people's doxa, advancing our understanding of being in the world and communicating with one another, if it is a method for gaining an observational perspective on how things appear in a particular way through dialogue. Using the movie Blow-Up as a case study, a rhetorical analysis of the process of observational conversation is used to explain it.
Keywords
Rhetoric, observational discourse, language
References
Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. I&II). (J. Barnes, Ed.) Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Austin, J. (1994). How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.
Buren, J. V. (1994) . Aristotle. In J. V. Buren, The young Heidegger (pp. 220- 234). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
. Elden, S. (2005). Reading Logos as speech: Heidegger, Aristotle and rhetorical politics. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 38(4), 281-301.
Gross, D. M. (2017). Heidegger's 1924 Lecture course on Aristotle's Rhetoric: key research implications. 50(4), 509-527.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. M. Robinson, Trans.) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Heidegger, M. (2009). Basic concepts of Aristotelian philosophy. (R. D. Tanzer, Trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and truth. (G. F. Polt, Trans.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hyde, M. J. (1994). The call of conscience: Heidegger and the question of rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 27(4), 374-96.
Kisiel, T. (2000). Situating rhetorical politics in Heidegger's protopractical ontology 1923–25: The French occupy the Ruhr. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 8(2), 185-208.
Kompridis, N. (2014). Working enigma: receiving Antonioni‘s Blow- up(Abstract). The Image in Question Conference, 3 August 2014. Sydney College of the Arts,University of Sydney. Retrieved September 13th, 2018, from http://www.theimageinquestion.net/?page_id=20
Marassi, M. (1986). The hermeneutics of rhetoric in Heidegger. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 19(2), 79-98.
Marshall, D. L. (2017). Rhetorical trajectories from the early Heidegger,.Philosophy & Rhetoric, 50(1), 50-72.
Schrag, C. O. (1986). Communicative Praxis and the Space of Subjectivity Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Scult, A. (1999). Aristotle's rhetoric as ontology: A Heideggerian reading. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 32(2), 146-159.
Sheehan, T. (2005). Dasein. In H. L. Dreyfus, & M. A. Wrathall (Eds.), A Companion to Heidegger (pp. 193-213). Malden:MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Sheehan, T. (2014). What, after all, was Heidegger about? Continental Philosophy Review, 47(3-4), 249-274.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pankaj Lakethe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Ethics:
- Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to use any copyrighted materials included in their manuscript.
- Authors are also responsible for ensuring that their research was conducted in an ethical manner and in compliance with institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals or human subjects.
- By submitting a manuscript to International Journal of Computer Science & Information System (IJCSIS), authors agree to transfer copyright to the journal if the manuscript is accepted for publication.