Background: Natural fiber–reinforced polymer composites (NFPCs) have emerged as compelling sustainable alternatives to conventional synthetic-fiber composites because of their renewable origins, low density, and favorable specific mechanical properties (Bledzki et al., 1998; Chawla, 1987). Over the last three decades, research has progressed from basic characterization and processing of wood-flour and plant-fiber filled thermoplastics to sophisticated chemical surface treatments, hybridization strategies combining multiple natural and synthetic reinforcements, and the integration of data-driven predictive methods to anticipate mechanical performance (Hull & Clyne, 1996; Bledzki & Gassan, 1999; Kumar et al., 2025).
 Objectives: This work synthesizes the theoretical foundations, mechanistic understanding, empirical trends, and predictive modeling approaches relevant to NFPCs, with explicit attention to cellulose-based fibers, wood-flour fillers, and hybrid fiber systems. The goal is to provide a rigorous, publication-ready synthesis that links microscale interfacial chemistry, mesoscale morphology, and macroscale mechanical response—while mapping how chemical modification, processing variables, moisture, and hybrid architectures combine to determine static and dynamic properties.
 Methods: The article integrates classical composite micromechanics, interfacial adhesion theory, extensive literature-derived empirical observations, and contemporary machine learning–enabled predictive approaches to create a coherent narrative. Methods are presented descriptively—detailing experimental designs commonly used in the literature (tensile, flexural, impact, dynamic mechanical analysis, moisture absorption tests), chemical and physical fiber treatments, hybrid stacking strategies, and data-driven model development pipelines (feature selection, supervised learning, cross-validation). Each methodological element is linked to its mechanistic rationale and to reported results across the cited literature (Chawla, 1987; Bledzki & Gassan, 1999; Wang et al., 2006; Karamov et al., 2022).
Results: Collated findings indicate consistent patterns: (1) chemical treatments (alkali, silane, acetylation, fatty acid plasticization) systematically improve fiber–matrix adhesion and tensile strength when optimized, though excessive treatment degrades fiber integrity (Suardana et al., 2010; Marion et al., 2003); (2) hybridization employing wood flour, short natural fibers (jute, hemp, kenaf, sisal, banana), and controlled synthetic phases can be tuned to balance stiffness, toughness, and moisture sensitivity (Mwaikambo & Ansell, 2003; Thiagamani et al., 2022; Balaji et al., 2019); (3) moisture absorption remains a critical degradation mechanism that compromises interface and mechanical properties unless mitigated via coupling agents, matrix selection, or encapsulation strategies (Wang et al., 2006); (4) machine learning models trained on curated material descriptors and processing parameters show promising predictive accuracy for tensile strength and other mechanical endpoints, but their reliability depends on dataset quality, descriptor selection, and interpretability strategies (Karamov et al., 2022; Kumar et al., 2025).

Conclusions: The literature collectively supports a paradigm in which successful NFPC design arises from multipronged control of fiber chemistry, interface engineering, microstructural architecture, and moisture management—augmented increasingly by data-centric predictive frameworks. Future work should target standardized datasets, mechanistically informed descriptors, and systematic studies of long-term environmental durability.

natural fiber composites, cellulose fibers, hybrid composites, interfacial modification

Hull, D. and Clyne, T.W. 1996. An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bledzki, A. K., Reinhmane, S. and Gassan, J. 1998. Thermoplastics reinforced with wood fillers. Polym Plast. Technol. Eng. 37:451-468.

Chawla, K.K. 1987. Composite Materials. Science and Engineering. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Schneider, J. P.; Myers, G. E.; Clemons, C. M.; English, B. W. Eng Plast 1995, 8 (3), 207.

Reinforced Plastics 1997, 41(11), 22.

Colberg, M.; Sauerbier, M. Kunstst-Plast Europe 1997, 87(12), 9.

Schloesser, Th.; Knothe, J. Kunstst-Plast Europe 1997, 87 (9).

Bledzki, A.K. and Gassan, J. 1999. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 24:221-274.

Marion, P., Andréas, R. and Marie, H.M. 2003. Study of wheat gluten plasticization with fatty acids. Polym. 44:115-122.

Mwaikambo, L.Y. and Ansell, M.P. 2003. Hemp fiber reinforced cashew nut shell liquid composites.

Maya Jacob John, Rajesh D. Anandjiwala. A recent developments in chemical modifications and characterization of natural fibre reinforced composites.

Mehdi Tajvidi. Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of a Kenaf Fiber–Wood Flour/Polypropylene Hybrid Composite. DOI 10.1002/app.22093.

A. Shahzad, D.H. Isaac and S.M. Alston. Mechanical Properties of Natural Composites.

Suardana, Yingjun Piao, Jae Kyoo Lim. Mechanical properties of Hemp fibres and Hemp/PP Composites: Effects of chemical surface treatment. December 2010.

Wang, W., Sain, M. & Cooper, P. A. Study of moisture absorption in natural fiber plastic composites. Comp. Sci. Tech. 66, 379–386 (2006).

Habibi, M., Laperrière, L. & Hassanabadi, H. M. Replacing stitching and weaving in natural fiber reinforcement manufacturing, part 1: Mechanical behavior of unidirectional flax fiber composites. J. Nat. Fibers. 16, 1064–1076 (2019).

Shalwan, A. & Yousif, B. F. State of art: Mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibers. Mater. Des. 48, 14–24 (2013).

Rohit, K. & Dixit, S. A review—Future aspect of natural fiber reinforced composite. Poly. Renew. Res. 7, 43–59 (2016).

Bharath, K. N. & Basavarajappa, S. Applications of biocomposite materials based on natural fibers from renewable resources: A review. Sci. Eng. Comp. Mater. 23, 123–133 (2016).

Kumar, S. S. Effect of natural fiber loading on mechanical properties and thermal characteristics of hybrid polyester composites for industrial and construction fields. Fibers Polym. 21, 1508–1514 (2020).

Subramanian, S. & Kumar, S. S. Investigation of mechanical attributes and dynamic mechanical analysis of hybrid polyester composites. Fibers Polym. 23, 2736–2745 (2022).

Al Mahmud, M. Z., Islam, M. D. & Rabbi, S. M. F. Analysis of epoxy composites reinforced with jute, banana, and coconut coirs and enhanced with Rubik’s layer: Tensile, bending, and impact performance evaluation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 147, 106151 (2023).

Balaji, A. et al. Study on mechanical and morphological properties of sisal/banana/coir fiber–reinforced hybrid polymer composites. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 386 (2019).

Sumesh, K. R., Kavimani, V., Rajeshkumar, G., Indran, S. & Saikrishnan, G. Effect of banana, pineapple and coir fly ash filled with hybrid fiber epoxy–based composites for mechanical and morphological study. J. Mater. Cyc. Was. Manag. 23, 1277–1288 (2021).

Thiagamani, S. M. K. et al. Mechanical, absorption, and swelling properties of jute/kenaf/banana reinforced epoxy hybrid composites: Influence of various stacking sequences. Polym. Comp. 43, 8297–8307 (2022).

Saleem, M. M., Kumar, M. & Malhi, G. S. Predictive analysis of fused deposition modeling of PLA material through machine learning. AIP Conf. Proc. 2986, 020003 (2024).

Pan, G. et al. Advances in machine learning– and artificial intelligence–assisted material design of steels. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 30, 1003–1024 (2023).

Shlykov, S., Rogulin, R., & Kondrashev, S. (2022). Determination of the dynamic performance of natural viscoelastic composites with different proportions of reinforcing fibers. Curved and Layered Structures, 9(1), 116-123.

Karamov, R., Akhatov, I. & Sergeichev, I. V. 2022. Prediction of fracture toughness of pultruded composites based on supervised machine learning. Polym. 14, 3619.

Zhu, D. et al. 2023. Identifying intrinsic factors for ductile–to–brittle transition temperatures in Fe–Al intermetallics via machine learning. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26, 8836–8845.

Chen, Y. et al. 2023. Identifying facile material descriptors for Charpy impact toughness in low–alloy steel via machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 132, 213–222.

Kotsiantis, S. B. 2007. Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Informatica 31, 249–268.

Kumar, S. S., Shyamala, P. & Pati, P. R. 2025. Machine learning algorithms to predict the tensile strength of novel composite materials. Next Mater. 9, 101105.