This study examines the dynamics of individuals' multiple team membership (MTM), focusing on its benefits and disadvantages within organizational contexts. Organizational tenure is investigated as a moderating factor that influences the outcomes of MTM. Using a mixed-methods approach, including quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, data were collected from employees across various industries. Results indicate that while MTM can enhance information sharing, skill development, and innovation, it may also lead to role ambiguity, time pressures, and reduced job satisfaction. Organizational tenure moderates these effects, influencing how individuals perceive and manage their involvement in multiple teams. Insights from this research contribute to understanding the nuanced impacts of MTM and inform organizational strategies for optimizing team structures and employee experiences.

Multiple team membership, organizational tenure, team dynamics

Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665.

Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.

Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627.

Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.

Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A comprehensive model of team effectiveness. In M. A. West (Ed.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 31-49). John Wiley & Sons.

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.

Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1-37.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 251-276). John Wiley & Sons.

Zaccaro, S. J., & Klimoski, R. (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: An introduction. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today’s leaders (pp. 3-16). Jossey-Bass.